Washington, Oct 28:
An Indian man in the US allegedly married his sister while his
wife married his brother as part of a "phony wedding" scheme so
that the man's siblings could evade immigration waiting periods, a
media report said.
The grand jury indictment, which cites multiple counts of
conspiracy, fraud and misuse of visas, was unsealed on Tuesday in
a local US District Court naming Harbans Kaur Hothi, 51, and her
husband, Paramjit Singh Taggar, 44, along with his brother,
Gurdeep Singh Atwal, 43, and sister, Pritam Kaur, 35, as
defendants.
While both Hothi and Taggar are naturalized US citizens, the
brother, Atwal, who lives in Fresno, and the sister, Kaur, who
lives in San Jose, had been on a fast-track program for US
citizenship when the alleged fraud was uncovered, according to a
Fresno Bee report.
Assistant US Attorney David L Gappa, who is prosecuting the
case, said the normal waiting period to immigrate to America from
India for a brother or sister of a US citizen is 13 years. There
is no waiting period for a spouse.
The indictment accuses the couple of lying about the marriages
in order to have them immediately immigrate to the US from India,
the report said.
According to the indictment, Hothi and Taggar were married in
1983 and divorced in January 1994. But they continued to live as
husband and wife.
Investigators said the couple agreed to divorce in order to
enter "into sham marriages" with Atwal and Kaur.
(PTI) |
|
Washington,
Oct 27: The American Muslim vote is going overwhelmingly to Kerry
though he has done little, if anything, to earn it.
Kerry has made no effort to woo the Muslim vote to date, although
it is now widely known and reported that the Muslim-American
community is going to vote for him, 10 to 1. “It is not so much for
Kerry who has just ignored us and who has taken a hard position on
the Middle East, not qualitatively different from that of President
Bush, but because we consider Bush and his administration to be
dead set against Muslims. He has made war on Muslim countries and
the treatment meted out to the Muslim community in America itself
since 9/11 has been discriminatory, if not racist” one Muslim
political activist told this correspondent.
New York Times columnist William Safire, one of the leading
apologists for Israel and all causes Israeli, wrote on Monday, “You
have to give credit to Arab-Americans, and to the overlapping
category of American Muslims, for knowing what side they are on in
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - and for voting for those they
believe would address their concerns.
Four years ago, they voted almost two to one for George W Bush,
thinking he would act like his father. Today, according to the
Zogby poll, American Muslim voters are going 10 to 1 in the
opposite political direction - for John Kerry over Bush. Not only
do they see Bush’s Patriot Act as discriminatory, most of these
Americans dislike the president’s unwavering support of Israel
-including his backing of Ariel Sharon’s security fence and the
diplomatic isolation of Yasir Arafat.”
Safire noted that “this stunning reversal of opinion” within a
growing voting bloc is having an impact. For example, about a half
million Arab-Americans live in Michigan, according to the Arab
American Institute; most have turned strongly anti-Bush. That’s why
pollsters are counting Michigan, with its 17 electoral votes, as
“leaning toward Kerry.” He notes that in the last election, 20
percent of the American Jewish vote went to Bush, but this time he
was going to receive no more than 20 percent of that 20 percent.
This was despite the fact that this “President has firmly backed
Israel’s vigorous self-defense - and time and again vetoed or
denounced lopsided UN votes to ostracize Israel - 8 out of 10
Jewish American voters will still vote as a bloc to oust him.”
Safire argued that most Jewish Americans quite properly base their
vote on issues like social justice, civil liberty, economic
fairness and not primarily on what may be good for Israel.
Most Arab-Americans and US Muslims, as is their right, disparage
Sharon’s Gaza plan. But in getting out of Gaza, the national
interests of the US and Israel are in accord, he added, and urged
American Jews to go for Bush rather than Kerry who, he implied, was
“most likely to help gain a secure peace in the Middle East.”
Another report appearing in the Washington Post on Monday also
stressed that Muslims were going to vote in large numbers for
Kerry, when they voted for Bush in election 2000. Absar Chowdhury
from Bangladesh said he would vote for Kerry next week because
President Bush has disappointed him in several ways. In particular,
Chowdhury cited an erosion of civil liberties, including the
continuing use of secret evidence, and the war in Iraq, which has
left thousands of Iraqis and more than 1,100 Americans dead.
Chowdhury, the report noted, “is emblematic of a dramatic switch
among Muslim voters. Four years ago, 42 percent of them voted for
Bush. But in this year’s race, they are expected to vote
overwhelmingly for his Democratic opponent, with one recent poll
showing 76 percent of the Muslim vote going to Kerry and 7 percent
to Bush. ‘For American Muslims, there has been a sea change in
political alignment and outlook since 9/11,’ said Zahid H Bukhari,
director of Georgetown University’s Project MAPS, a long-term
research project on American Muslims, which commissioned Zogby
International to conduct the recent poll. ‘No matter what Bush says
to Muslims right now, it doesn’t matter because he’s broken so much
trust with our community,’ said Nabil Yousef, 21, of Arlington, a
Georgetown University senior who started a Muslim website in
August.”
Mukit Hossain, another Muslim, told the Post, “Voter registration
is in the 90 percent range, and I would be very surprised if almost
80 percent of those people don’t come out to vote.” He said his
committee counted about 10,000 newly registered Muslim voters in
the Washington area in recent months: 1,000 in the District, 4,000
in Maryland and 5,000 in Virginia. He pointed out that this had
brought the number of registered Muslim voters to 3,700 in the
District and 48,000 in Virginia, with no statewide figure available
in Maryland.
According to one estimate, there are at least 700,000 registered
Muslim voters nationwide, but little hard data from independent
sources are available. African Americans, who make up about 30
percent of the Muslim American population, traditionally vote
Democratic by an overwhelming margin. But Democrat Al Gore received
the votes of only 55 percent of African American Muslims in 2000,
and Bush drew votes from 49 percent of South Asian Muslims and 54
percent of Arab Muslims in that election, according to Georgetown’s
Bukhari. Polls also show a move away from Bush among the country’s
1.7 million to 2 million registered Arab-American voters, 46
percent of whom voted Republican in 2000. Three-quarters of the US
electorate is Christian, and they have similar concerns as Muslims
on racial profiling, the war in Iraq and the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, according to pollster John Zogby, head of Zogby
International.
Among Arab Americans, “the issues of civil liberties and racial
profiling tend to impact Muslims and immigrants more,” Zogby said.
“But it is still cited as a problem - less acute but still a
problem - among Christians and American-born” Arabs. The
anticipated swing to Kerry could be crucial in some battleground
states with significant Muslim and Arab populations, analysts said.
The Washington Post report said that Florida, where Bush won by 537
votes in 2000, has 120,717 registered Muslim voters, according to
an analysis of state voter rolls by Hossain’s Muslim American
Political Action Committee and the District-based Muslim American
Society Freedom Foundation.
In addition, the Arab American Institute in Washington estimates a
likely turnout of 515,000 Arab American voters in four key states:
235,000 in Michigan, 120,000 in Florida, 85,000 in Ohio and 75,000
in Pennsylvania. In a September survey of 502 Arab American voters
in those states, 49 percent said they intended to vote for Kerry,
and 31.5 percent said they would support Bush. (Daily Times) |