HOME Opinion

 

 

Home  

 

 

Pak elections are over, now what?
By Irshad Salim

 

Parties opposed to President General Pervez Musharraf have won a sizeable number of seats in the race for a new national parliament and the four provincial assemblies. The strong showing of the Mutahidda Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), an Islamic coalition of six fiery anti-Western religious parties, will definitely change the dynamics of Pakistan's politics as the MMA appears to hold the balance of power.

Significantly, the pro-Taliban MMA has registered a clean sweep in the Pashtun belt that borders unstable Afghanistan, and which is mostly anti-US, with it winning sufficient support to single-handedly form the provincial governments in Baluchistan and the North West Frontier Province. Both these provinces had provided critical logistics and support to the US-funded Afghan jihad(war) against communist Russia.

Qazi Hussain, the head of the Jamaat-i-Islami, one of the best organized parties in the MMA, wasted no time in calling for the closure of all US air bases in Pakistan, against a background of small arms being fired into the sky and banners proclaiming anti-US sentiments. He also sounded a warning to the Western media: stop defaming Islam.

Pakistan Muslim League Qaide Azam (PML-QA), supportive of President Pervez Musharraf and referred to as the 'King's Party', has won 80 seats followed by 62 bagged by Pakistan People's Party Parliamentarians (PPPP)- a wholly owned subsidiary of Benazir Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party. MMA- the anti-western alliance of Taliban-supportive religious parties won 52. Independents 26! And, PPPP's present political partner PML(N) won only 14 seats.

"Thank you, General Pervez Musharraf, for delivering us from the likes of Nawaz Sharif and handing us over to Qazi Hussain Ahmad and Maulana Fazlur Rehman," said Friday Times, a lone moderate voice in the otherwise conservative Pakistani media.

"The MMA will be an unprecedented integral element of the National Assembly in days to come. It may well be a partner in the government of Pakistan in Islamabad as well. But, to be sure, it will form the next two governments in the two provinces of the NWFP and Balochistan. In a third, Punjab, it will be a critical part of the ruling coalition in alliance with any one faction of the PML or possibly even with the PPP. And in Karachi it will stage a significant comeback since its ouster in 1981 " voiced Friday Times.

Such apt and fast opinion declaration by a highly respected news media actually reflects the thought-process of a small,  affluent but very powerful Pakistani elite who traditionally look towards the west for its intellectual survival. Ironically, its influence on Pakistan politics is larger than its sheer size.

The president of the PPP, Makhdoom Amin Fahim, is in London for discussions with Bhutto, who was barred from contesting the elections herself pending charges of corruption. Prior to his departure Fahim had talks with General  Musharraf and the all-powerful ISI in which it is reported that Fahim was offered the premiership if his party formed a coalition with the PML-QA and the independents. This would prevent the MMA from exercising their newly created "nuisance value", as one analyst put it. Whether this idea would turn into a reality is as open a guess as the future of Pakistan's politics itself.

Western powers, albeit 'the coalition against terror', may have blessed this idea, given the seriousness of  the Western coalition's interests in the turbulent South-Asian regional politics. It is a fact that the West will continue to sit in Afghanistan to protect their realigned geo-political interests ever since communist Russian empire disintegrated into smaller independent pro-capitalist nations, thereby throwing open the battle to control access to the Central Asian resources.

Whether Washington likes it or not, American policy is seen as anti-Islamic and the campaign against Al-Qaeda and the Taleban is viewed as a campaign against Islam. More than anything else, that is the message that the US must take from the unexpectedly strong showing of the MMA.

General Musharraf, who will definitely remain Pakistan's president, and West's 'ally against terror' for another five years, is clearly keen to get an assembly with which he (and the western powers specially the US) can work, but should this not be the case, he(and the US) have other options. In short, the rules of the Pakistani game may be dictated by the policies of the West!

After the elections a new military-dominated national security council will take all key decisions - on foreign policy, Pakistan's nuclear weapons and its relationship with the West and  India. Musharraf will head the council, with other service chiefs. He has also given himself the power to sack the new prime minister and dissolve parliament. In short, assuring a cooperative Prime Minister and a moderate government will provide the neccessary insurance to maintain continuity of steps taken by the military junta.

A founding member of PPP, has been quoted having said that the party had traditionally won elections on anti-US sloganeering. This time, however, with Musharraf taking Pakistan into the US camp in its war against terror, the PPP chose not to speak out against the US - in fact, it gave its support to the US agenda in the region.

That might have set the stage for a western-backed Musharraf-PPPP cooperation. But PML-QA, which is the 'King's party' notched the top slot contrary to pre-poll projections which had said PPPP would emerge as the single largest party.

That does not mean Musharraf's coterie of political pundits did not advice him to approach PPPP to form a coalition with PML(Q) albeit 'King's Party', and other like-minded moderate groups in order to counter MMM's rise as a national political force in the otherwise turbulent political scene.

Given the fact that MMA will definitley form state governments in the two northern provinces of NWFP and Baluchistan and will choose to run the affairs of their provinces on a striclty Islamic line, Musharraf's move to create "strange bed-fellows" on the national level is a shrewd and  meaningful move but is short-sighted and may not work in the long run!

Indeed, the MMA has wiped out the two mainstream moderate political parties - the PPP and the PML - from the scene in the NWFP and Balochistan. The vacuum created by Musharraf is a direct result of his pursuit to keep the two national politicians out of the political arena. The collateral damages have shown up.

Thanks to General Musharraf and President George Bush, whose pre-emptive anti-Taliban and anti-al-Qaeda policies (read anti-Islam) were equally responsible for nudging the Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Amir Jammat Islami & power brokerconservative and deeply religious people of these areas into the arms of the MMA. The irony is that when Qazi Hussain Ahmad and Maulana Fazlur Rehman control the levers of power in the frontier regions, including the police and administration, it will become difficult for Islamabad and Washington to enforce their writ in these areas and the task of hunting down the rebellious Taliban and hostile Al-Qaeda will become almost impossible. We may also expect both provinces to unfurl so-called shariah practices that reinforce the negative “image” of Pakistan abroad.

When the establishment got rid of Benazir Bhutto in 1990, it made way for Nawaz Sharif. When it got rid of Sharif in 1993, it made way for Bhutto. When it got rid of Bhutto in 1996, it made way for Sharif. But when Musharraf got rid of Sharif in 1999 and started to hound Bhutto as well, he made way for the MMA.

Maybe this is just what Musharraf and his team wanted:

1. Two critical provinces bordering Afghanistan with the anti-America MMA so that the establishment can drive a hard bargain with Washington.

2. Coalition governments in the other two provinces in which pro-establishment minorities or majorities can keep “democracy” in check.

3. The armed and unarmed jihadis inside and outside the establishment should be pleased by the election results. Having “lost” Afghanistan, they have now acquired a large base area of their own in their own homeland. They couldn't have tailored a better outcome for themselves.

That is why, in time to come, this “election” may acquire the same ominous significance in the history of Pakistan as the 1970 elections under another “sincere” military dictator.

 



News stories:
Europe isn't marching to U.S. drum
Iran's Crown Prince plots insurrection
US company, not Powell helped stop Indo-Pak war

Home

Top

Next

Questions? email us
Copyright © 1999-2002 DesPardes Inc. All Rights Reserved
Site developed & maintained by  Mamosa Solutions Inc., NJ, USA