Explore
Articles/Opinions
Astrology
Bangladesh News
Blogs
Calendar
Cartoons
Chanachoor
Classifieds
Courtyard
Lettingo
Diaspora News
Entertainment
Bangladesh
India
Pakistan
Snapshots
Fashion
Catwalk
News
Snapshots
Food
Eating out
Glossary
News
Recipes
Restaurants
Hottie of the day
India
News
Lifestyle
Message
Board
Money Transfer
Movies
National Anthems
News Explorer
News Features
Newsmakers
Offbeat
Oscar-Tango
Pakistan
News
People
Shop
on Line
Snapshots
Sports
Snapshots
Top
Picks
Unzipped
Urdu
Videos
World News Sites
|
|
|
|
Bangladesh’s Sleeping Frankenstein |
|
By Dr Ayesha Siddiqa |
|
|
|
Allowing the
military to interfere in politics and play the role of a
socio-political arbiter by bringing it in to control the
streets is a risky approach |
Recently, the Bangladeshi military was called out into the
streets to control the pre-election political mayhem. The
country’s political elite see this as a benign use of the
armed forces in support of civilian authorities, which might
not necessarily whet the military’s appetite for greater
power and authority. The Bangladeshis proudly flaunt their
national experience of pushing the ‘men on horseback’ back
into the barracks. However, the recent deployment of the
troops to control violence prior to the elections in January
is part of a flawed strategy which will surely strengthen
the armed forces versus the civilian players and the civil
society at large.
The present-day Bangladeshi political analysts tend to take
the military’s formal withdrawal from politics as a fixed
variable in the country’s politics. The ‘argumentative’
Bengalis, it is believed, are far too strong to encourage
the army to take over politics. A similar belief exists in
relation to the influence of the religious right in the
country. Bangladeshi society is far too liberal to allow the
Jamaat-i-Islami and other religious parties to take over the
society.
The military had originally taken over power in 1975 after
the assassination of Sheikh Mujeeb-ur-Rehman. The army
leadership, which was unhappy with Mujeeb’s policies and
fearful that he might actually be trying to replace the
standing army with a people’s army, was happy to get rid of
him. The concept of a national army was discussed at the
Formation Commander’s Conference held at the Bangladesh
Forces Headquarters on January 02, 1972, in which the
Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces discussed the Prime
Minister’s directions to the Army GHQ to form a national
militia. The idea was to have a people’s army as a 2nd line
of defence to support a small standing military. The plans,
however, were never implemented, mainly because, as claimed
by Maj. General (retd) Shafeeullah, Mujeeb tended to leave
defence issues to the military. Moreover, the founding
father was too busy consolidating his power, which he took
for granted, to take the military too seriously.
The military, which took over power in 1975, was ridden with
internal divisions, mainly between the freedom fighters and
the repatriated personnel. Out of the 55,000 personnel,
28,000 were repatriated from Pakistan (including 1100
officers). These personnel had not gone through the
experience of the liberation war and had a different mindset
from the freedom fighters who were part of the Mukti Bahni.
General Zia-ur-Rehman, who took over in 1975, had nothing in
common with the leftist party Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (JSD),
which was more popular amongst the freedom fighters and one
of the key players behind the political turbulence
surrounding Mujeeb’s violent death. However, JSD was not
necessarily behind the founding father’s assassination.
Mujeeb’s death allowed the officer cadre, most of which was
trained in West Pakistan, to consolidate power. The
prominent Bangladeshi political analyst Talukder
Maniruzzaman was of the view that the repatriated officers
in particular were looking for an officer such as
Zia-ur-Rehman who could take over the army and the country
and thwart the efforts of the JSD — a party which was
unhappy with Sheikh Mujeeb’s rule and his controversial
policies such as using military force against the Naxilites.
The military takeover transformed the armed forces into a
serious political player and further changed the course of
the country’s politics. Zia-ur-Rehman used fascist tactics
such as flirting with the religious right to gain greater
popularity. This was the period during which the
Jamaat-i-Islami was brought back into Bangladeshi politics.
Zia-ur-Rehman was assassinated in 1981 and replaced by
General Ershad, who ruled Bangladesh until 1990. Ershad is
responsible for giving a corporate character to the military
through encouraging its political and financial autonomy.
Measures such as the building of the military’s welfare
foundation, the Sena Kalyan Sangstha, and encouraging its
profit-making ventures were meant to bolster the armed
forces financial autonomy. The foundation was a legacy of
the Fauji Foundation from the days of united Pakistan.
The ‘argumentative’ Bengalis, however, pushed the military
back in 1990. Ershad was forced to resign after a popular
political uprising. Since then, the Bangladeshi military
appears to be firmly under the control of the civilian
governments. The three branches of the armed forces, army,
navy and air force, and the intelligence agencies are
controlled by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), which is
currently the central controlling nerve of the armed forces,
and comprises of a Principal Staff Officer (of the rank of a
Major General) and the Armed Forces Division (AFD)
representing the three services of the military. Besides the
PSO and the AFD, the PMO also controls the National Security
Intelligence (NSI), which is the primary intelligence
organisation of the state. The other intelligence
establishment, the Directorate-General of Forces
Intelligence (DGFI) is controlled by the Ministry of Defence
(MoD). Since the prime minister is also the defence
minister, the office-bearer by default comes under the PMO.
After 1996, successive prime ministers have also
strengthened their control over the military through keeping
the MoD weak and boosting the power of the PMO instead. The
MoD is confined to mundane routine affairs such vas pay and
pension, retirement, and other budgetary issues. Moreover,
it is responsible for related departments such as the Survey
of Bangladesh, Military Electricity Supply (MES) and the
Meteorological Department.
This administrative arrangement gives Bangladeshi analysts
their confidence regarding the military’s impotence to take
over the reigns of the government again. However, the fact
is that the political class entered into an informal and
unwritten arrangement with the armed forces whereby the
military agreed to push back into the barracks in return for
the protection of its fundamental corporate interests.
Therefore, over the years, successive political governments
have not reduced the defence budget, have upheld the primacy
of the threat from India, periodically acquired major weapon
systems to ‘keep the boys happy’, and allowed the armed
forces to pursue their money-making and profit-making
activities.
Although both the Awami League (AL) and Bangladesh
Nationalist Party governments have kept the defence budget
sustained at higher level, the main source of the
Bangladeshi military’s income is UN peace-keeping missions.
According to one estimate, about 40,000 troops have served
on the UN peace-keeping mission duties and there are about
11,000 troops serving on such missions at a given time.
Furthermore, the armed forces’ welfare foundation is now in
the hotel business, with stakes in the Raddison Hotel in
Dhaka. Besides, the Sena Kalyan Sangstha runs a flour mill,
an ice cream factory, a hosiery mill, a fabric manufacturing
factory, a textile factory, a CNG project, bread and
confectionary factory, an electricity products manufacturing
unit, a television manufacturing plant, and has stakes in
real estate.
The military’s presence in business is increasing gradually
and seems to have undergone growth as a result of the flow
of capital due to the UN peace-keeping missions. Part of the
earnings from the UN peace-keeping missions are diverted
towards the projects of the welfare foundation.
Some observers believe that as long as the military gets its
extra funds from the UN peace-keeping missions, the
institution will not be tempted to look inside the country
for additional resources. No one in Bangladesh seems to
consider the impact of allowing the military to penetrate
the corporate sector. Not much thought is given to what will
happen if the earnings from the UN dry up.
The financial autonomy goes hand in hand with the growing
social significance of the armed forces. Even the seemingly
ideologically more progressive parties such as the AL have
allowed the military both direct and indirect penetration in
politics and the economy. The direct infiltration pertains
to giving the military control of certain institutions such
as the Khulna Shipyard the Machine Tool Factory in the name
of greater discipline and efficiency. The indirect
penetration takes the form of greater number of retired
military personnel joining political parties and running for
parliamentary elections and being absorbed into the private
sector. Such measures bolster the military’s overall
influence. According to a Bangladeshi security and political
analyst, Abdul Rob Khan, both political parties try to
placate the armed forces through giving it and its retired
members a greater role institutionally.
Against this backdrop, allowing the military to interfere in
politics and play the role of a socio-political arbiter by
bringing it in to control the streets is a risky approach.
While the military might not opt to take over power again,
it would certainly gain greater strength in negotiating a
better power arrangement vis-à-vis the civilian players.
Giving a military the policing role, in any case, is always
risky. A combination of increased policing and economic role
becomes a lethal combination.
|
|
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not reflect
those of DesPardes.com |
|
|
|
Have Your Say > |
|
|
E-mail it to:Articles@despardes.com
|
The author is an Islamabad-based independent defence
analyst. She is also an author of a book on Pakistan’s
arms procurement decision-making, and on the
military’s economic interests
More Articles & Opinions
Brave Departure or Shameful Flight?
by Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta
"..life is not a ball game and nations cannot simply
withdraw from wars without thinking it through..." |
|
 |
Five lessons Kofi Annan did not learn while leading the UN
by Jamil Usman
He lamented the so-called genocide in Darfur but did not say a word about the persecution of people in Chechnya, Palestine
and Kashmir.. |
Bangladesh’s Sleeping Frankenstein
Dr Ayesha Siddiqa
The Bangladeshis proudly flaunt their national experience of
pushing the ‘men on horseback’ back into the barracks.
However.. |
Future of Iraq: The spoils of war
By Danny Fortson, Andrew Murray-Watson
and Tim Webb
"So where is the oil going to come from?... The
Middle East, with two-thirds of the world's oil and the
lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies,"
(Dick Cheney) |
Pak-Americans Doing Well, Spell Casters Even Better
BY KHALID
HASAN
Twenty-four year old Saima from California can’t find a
husband. She wants to know how that can be rectified. She is
told to recite a certain Quranic verse eight times after
late evening prayers and another verse 11 times.. |
My Mother Does Not Cook Cows
by Mayank Austen Soofi
We Hindus consider the sweet-looking bovine creatures as
mothers incarnate.. |
Pakistan "Next US Nightmare"
by Irshad Salim
The "Talibanisation" of Pakistan itself is now a looming
worry for the West. |
He Takes His Secrets to the Grave
by Robert Fisk
We still don't know - and with Saddam's execution we
will probably never know - the extent of US credits to Iraq,
which began in 1982.. |
|
A Dictator Created Then Destroyed by America
by Robert Fisk
"Handed over to the Iraqi authorities, " he may have been
before his death. But his execution will go down - correctly
- as an American affair.. |
Silencing Saddam by
Robert Scheer
The fact is that Saddam Hussein knew a great deal about the
United States’ role in Iraq, including deals made with
Bush’s father. |
Mai and Her Millions
BY MUHAMMAD ABD AL-HAMEED
I know MM [Mukhtaran Mai] fairly well, and have looked
closely at her organization and its finances. |
The General in his Labyrinth
by Tariq Ali
If there is a single consistent theme in Pervez Musharraf’s
memoir, it is the familiar military dogma that Pakistan has
fared better under its generals than under its politicians. |
Imran Khan the Politician
by Sarwar Sukhera
Envy of every testosterone-charged man, the debonair Mr.
Khan cut a macho figure after whom comely maidens lusted.
But that was yesterday. |
Bahawalpur's Two Ends
by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa
A few weeks ago on a usual trip to my ancestral village near
Bahawalpur I heard several stories of young and not-so-young
girls eloping with their lovers.. |
Pakistan: Ballot Or The Bullet
BY WAJID SHAMSUL HASAN
..the General does not want to give it up. This means that
the 2007 elections would no doubt be the “mother of all
elections” and decisive too... |
The holy cow called Israel
by Khalid Hasan
If Gen. Musharraf wants the world to believe that the 2007
elections in Pakistan are going to be free and fair...then
it is Jimmy Carter whose stamp of approval he should
obtain.. |
Why Balochistan Matters
by Wajid Shamsul Hasan
When Pakistan is nearing what think tanks forecast as the
inevitable denouement, its incorrigible military
establishment has closed its eyes to the writing on the
wall... |
Waves on Kashmir by
Qudssia Akhlaque
Every time the president advances these proposals, which
hinge on reciprocity, they create ripples with screaming
headlines.. |
The Bangladesh Lesson
by Dr Manzur Ejaz
All the Bengali students, with hardly any exception, stood
with the progressive students to oppose Islami Jamiat-i-Talba (IJT).. |
Re-Imagining Pakistan
by Pervez Hoodbhoy
"..let’s imagine a film like “Jinnah”. You die and fly off
to the arrival gate in heaven where an angel of the
immigration department screens newcomers from Pakistan.." |
Khan of Kalat Gathers the Tribes
“Bugti was buried with three locks on the coffin,” says Khan Suleiman. |
Her Majesty's Realpolitik by
Dr Ayehsa Siddiqa
The British government’s decision to forego the
investigation regarding the sale of BAE equipment (to Saudi
Arabia) is not only controversial but is also historic.. |
Aljazeera: Plot Thickens by
Ramzy Baroud
THE launch of Aljazeera International on November 15, the
English arm of Aljazeera Satellite Television was hardly an
ordinary event. |
Person of the Year: Sidarth "Macaca"
BY MICHAEL SCHERER
The Virginia native and son of Indian immigrants changed history with
a camcorder and introduced Sen. George Allen -- and the rest of us --
to the real America. |
The Great Tragedy by Faiz Al-Najdi
Unfortunately, the tragedy that began for these Pakistanis, after
surrender, did not simply end here... |
Greater Afghanistan or Great Pakistan
By ABID ULLAH JAN
"According to a report by Jyoti Malhotra, the British are now
talking of a partnership of equals between Britain and
India in the new century... Greater
Afghanistan would play a pivotal role in the whole set up." |
In a Town Fearful of Pakistanis, One Made Amends For Many
by Shaheen Sehbai
"Turn around," she ordered and when Masood (Haider)
did, she started to give him a shoulder massage... |
The 'Good Old' World by Razi
Azmi
One of the great pleasures of life up until TVs and VCRs became common
was a visit to a cinema hall to see a movie, particularly in an
air-conditioned one. |
NRI in Britain Like Coconuts: Brown Outside, White Inside
By Kul Bhushan
Brown from outside, 'Coconuts' are Indians who are white inside thus
implying their 'Britishness' in their language, habits and thinking. |
Afghanistan Imbroglio - Saying It Like It Is
BY KAMRAN SHAFI
Well done, Governor Aurakzai, for taking the bull by the horns and
telling the Brits off for the utter mess they are helping the
Americans make of Afghanistan... |
Watching Elections in America
By Art Buchwald TO MAKE sure our elections are fair, observers from democratic
countries are monitoring the process. They are spread out throughout
the country.. |
Globalization, Chaos and War BY
A S PANNEERSELVAN
..a closer reading of The Twilight of the Nation State
reveals that Jha is fulfilling the first rule of good journalism: that
of a timely whistleblower. |
No Dubai for Pakistan
BY Dr Manzur Ejaz
Karachi used to be quite a city...That is a thing of the
past. After the rise of religious fundamentalism in the
mid-seventies in Pakistan, not only Karachi, but other prime
tourist spots also started losing attraction.. |
Why a Christian in the White House Felt Betrayed
By DAVID KUO
President Bush didn't live up to his promises to the
religious right, - the Evangelicals - says a former member
of his faith-based initiative team.. |
Catholic Papacy
by Dr Manzur Ejaz
..the Church of Rome has the longest history of involvement
in state politics. In medieval times, it was the biggest
feudal lord and rent collector of Europe.." |
|