Explore
Articles/Opinions
Astrology
Bangladesh News
Blogs
Calendar
Cartoons
Chanachoor
Classifieds
Courtyard
Lettingo
Diaspora News
Entertainment
Bangladesh
India
Pakistan
Snapshots
Fashion
Catwalk
News
Snapshots
Food
Eating out
Glossary
News
Recipes
Restaurants
Hottie of the day
India
News
Lifestyle
Message
Board
Money Transfer
Movies
National Anthems
News Explorer
News Features
Newsmakers
Offbeat
Oscar-Tango
Pakistan
News
People
Shop
on Line
Snapshots
Sports
Snapshots
Top
Picks
Unzipped
Urdu
Videos
World News Sites
|
|
|
|
The Bangladesh Lesson |
|
|
|
By DR MANZUR EJAZ |
|
The creation of Bangladesh may have
been better for Muslim Bengalis but it has deprived Pakistan
of potent democratic forces. The gap left by the absence of
such forces cannot be filled by anyone else |
|
|
|
In 1971 it was not the Bengalis but almost the entire
Punjabi population, along with the Urdu-speaking population
of Sindh, who wanted ‘Bengal’. A few tiny progressive
groups, like the Young Peoples Front, some pro-Soviet
intellectuals and a handful of writers and elements of
Amador Kinas Party were raising stifled voices. However,
these feeble voices were drowned in the thunder of Bhutto’s
and other patriots’ rhetoric. Alas, in the Bengalis we lost
the best protectors of democracy in Pakistan and our best
allies even in the Punjab University.
I still remember an occasion on which a friend and myself
sat in the Punjab University New Campus cafeteria talking
about the agony of the Bengali Muslims and the sinful
support of military action that we witnessed around us. We
could not face our harassed and mentally tormented Bengali
friends in those days.
At that time, there were about sixty-to-seventy Bengali
students studying at Punjab University in an exchange
program. They all lived with us in hostels and were our best
ideological allies. All the Bengali students, with hardly
any exception, stood with the progressive students to oppose
Islami Jamiat-i-Talba (IJT). During the election days they
would come out with their own procession, raising slogans of
“Jalo Jalo Agan Jaloo.” Palestinian students were also major
allies of the progressive movement. Notwithstanding the
claims of Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) and other Islamic groups
these days, they were strong supporters of the US policies
then.
The military action in East Pakistan not only broke Pakistan
but also led to the dismemberment of progressive students’
alliances in Punjab’s educational institutions. Dr.
Aziz-ul-Haq and Professor Aziz-ud-Din were the major
intellectuals and organizers of the progressive students’
movement that started taking shape in 1968 in Punjab.
Nationalist Students Organization (NSO) was the main
platform established in the process. The National Student
Federation (NSF) was a powerful student organization, but
somehow it was quite negligible in Punjab, particularly in
Lahore. NSO gained such strength in universities that it
became very competitive with the IJT.
However, the division of opinion on military action in East
Bengal devastated this entire set-up. The final debate
between Dr. Aziz-ul-Haq and Professor Aziz-ud-Din took place
at Prof. Aijaz-ul-Hasan’s (the Daily Times columnist)
residence. The scene was quite funny because both sides used
the same pages of the Marxist classics to support their
position. It was like a religious munazara where befitting
quotes are hurled from both sides. Anyway, nothing came out
of this munazra and the NSO was split. Our group left the
NSO and kept on working under the banner of Young Peoples
Front, led by Dr. Aziz-ul-Haq.
To his credit, Dr. Aziz-ul-Haq was the only Punjabi
intellectual who formulated a theory regarding oppressed
nationalities in his famous pamphlet “Qaumaitoon ka masla”
(The issue of nationalities). In this path-breaking thesis
he argued that unless people from the oppressor
nationalities (Punjab and Karachi) support the oppressed
nationalities (East Bengal, Sindh, Balochistan and NWFP),
they couldn’t free themselves of dictatorship and an unjust
system.
Dr. Haq maintained that even tiny changes for better
political and socio-economic conditions were brought about
by the struggle of Bengali Muslims. In his view, Ayub Khan
had to go not because of a shallow movement in West Pakistan
but because of pressure from East Pakistanis. According to
Dr. Haq Muslim Bengalis, who wanted to free themselves of
domination by Hindu feudals and therefore played a crucial
role in the founding of Pakistan, were the best protectors
of democracy. By losing East Pakistan, the rest of
Pakistan’s people have been left to themselves to protect
democracy and they are not yet capable of that. The
unfolding of the events of the last three decades has proven
that Dr. Aziz-ul-Haq’s formulations were prophetic.
In the years following the fall of Bangladesh many
progressives supporting military action in East Pakistan
repented and corrected their attitude. However, it was too
late to put back the progressive coalition, that had become
the victim of military action. With the separation of East
Pakistan all our Bengali students were gone and, eventually,
the Palestinian students also left. Consequently, Punjab
University and other educational institutions were left to
the attentions of the JI and IJT.
The progressive elements of Punjab and Karachi learnt their
lesson, but now they are not in a position to effect any
meaningful change. The creation of Bangladesh may have been
better for Muslim Bengalis but it has deprived Pakistan of
potent democratic forces. The gap left by the absence of
such forces cannot be filled by anyone else. Baloch and
Sindhi nationalists are trying to fill the vacuum, but they
are much smaller in size and effectiveness.
The Pakistani state has learnt nothing from East Pakistan’s
experience. It is still seeking a military solution to the
Balochistan and Sindh problems. It believes that, given the
present geography of Pakistan, nationalists cannot achieve
their goals. They may, as usual, be living in illusions.
Time will tell.
However, the people of Punjab and other dominating
nationalities cannot get political or socio-economic freedom
from this oppressive system unless they support the
oppressed Baloch and Sindhi nationalities, as prescribed by
Dr. Aziz-ul-Haq.
I once asked a retiring Pakistani senator his opinion on who
delivered the most progressive speeches in the Pakistan
Senate. He said the Baloch representatives were the only
ones who spoke about socio-economic justice for the common
man. I was not surprised and neither should anyone else be
who remembers East Pakistani slogans of “Jalo Jalo Aagan
Jalo”.
|
|
|
|
The views expressed herein are the writers' own and do not reflect
those of DesPardes.com |
|
Have Your Say > |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-mail it to:Articles@despardes.com
|

Dr. Manzur Ejaz is a columnist for the Daily Times,
BBC, the Nation, and the News. A Professor of
Philosophy at the University of the Punjab in the 70's
and the 80's, he faced harassment from the Islamic
government of General Zia for his outspoken views,
leading him to seek refuge in the United States. Dr.
Ejaz did his Ph.D. in economics from Howard
University, Washington DC. He is the author of "
Epistemology of Development Economics", and "Ranjhan
Yar ..." a Punjabi play staged in Washington. His
email address is:
manzurejaz@yahoo.com
DesPardesPicks
@
desistore.com
--Quran
Ki Azmat Aur Uss Ki Bunyadi Talimaat
--If
I Am Assassinated by Z A Bhutto
--Heera
Mandi Ki Dar Pardah Saqafat
--Muslim
Showers
--Indus
Journey by Imran Khan
--Gandhi's
Passion -Stanley Wolpert
--More..
@
amazon.com
--Jesus,
Last King of Kashmir
|