 |
|
The Twilight of the Nation State:
Globalization, chaos and war
by Prem Shankar Jha
|
Book Review
Globalization is such a fascinating and powerful idea that
it never fails to evoke a strong reaction, either supporting
it with a missionary zeal or opposing it with the passion of
a suicide bomber. In the avalanche of rhetoric, facts
inevitably get blurred; false hopes and dreams hold sway
among some, while paranoia and nightmare grips others. To
make sense of the ongoing churning, one needs to move away
from these two extremes – to look at the fact more closely,
provide a historical perspective and caution the rest of us
about the pitfalls. Senior journalist Prem Shankar Jha has
now taken up that task. While the neo-evangelists of
globalization may term his voice as that of a doomsday
prophet, a closer reading of The Twilight of the Nation
State reveals that Jha is fulfilling the first rule of
good journalism: that of a timely whistleblower.
The post-Cold War transformation of the global economy and
politics has centered on three utopias: democracy,
liberalization and globalization. Jha
brings to the fore his concern for the unsaid – the pain of
transition, and the inherent contradictions in the
transformation. Drawing heavily from the works of historian
Eric Hobsbawm (who provides an introduction to this volume),
as well as social scientists Giovanni Arrighi and Fernand
Braudel, Jha places globalization within the context of the
development of capitalism, and helps readers appreciate how
much wishful thinking actually underlies the belief in human
progress.
Like any good
storyteller, after expounding the basic template of the book
Jha moves into two narratives. First, a chronological
account starting from the emergence of city-state capitalism
in Italy during the 14th century, to George W Bush’s extreme
form of unilateralism seven centuries later. Second, the
author punctuates this chronology with a discussion of the
systemic chaos the world is witnessing today. This provides
an immediacy that both allows insight into the limitations
of the ongoing debate, and draws the reader’s attention to
the simplistic assumption of a linear flow of politics and
global economic transformation. The interweaving of these
two narratives helps to keep the focus on the larger
picture, without loosing sight of the details.
Westphalian meltdown
The Twilight of the Nation State pays particular
attention to those thinkers who have realized the failure of
the current global politico-economic model. “This is not how
it was supposed to work,” Jha writes. “For generations,
students were taught that increasing trade and investment,
coupled with technological change, would drive national
productivity and create wealth.” But instead the opposite
was happening, and few in the developed economies seemed to
have noticed the reversal.
Jha poses a series of questions for which
economists do not yet have definitive answers:
If the neo-classical theory on wage
flexibility had been correct, it still evaded answering the
key question: How had the US and Europe achieved very high
rates of economic growth with very low rates of unemployment
in conditions of equal or greater wage rigidity between 1945
and 1973? What had changed since then? What was the engine
that had driven high economic growth in the earlier period
but ceased quite suddenly to do so in the 70s?
The chapter “Growing Obsolescence of the
Nation State” is also a grim reminder of the limitation of
the Marxist reading of the dissolution of the nation state
in favor of a proletarian regime. The nation state is
weakening not in favor of proletarian capitalism, the author
says, but in favor of neo-conservative capitalism.
The present idea of the nation state flows
from the Franco-Spanish treaty signed at Westphalia in
Germany during 1648 to end the Thirty Years’ War. Almost
three-and-a-half centuries later, the end of the Cold War
started the erosion of the Westphalian nation state. But
instead of a rollback in military bases belonging to the
sole remaining superpower – the US – more began to sprout.
In addition to US bases that were created during the Cold
War, from NATO bases to Japan to South Korea, the first Gulf
War gave birth to an American military presence in Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Egypt and Djibouti.
The break-up of Yugoslavia led to more US bases in Kosovo
and Bosnia. The collapse of the Soviet Union helped the US
to open bases in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and
Kyrgyzstan. After 11 September 2001, three cities in
Pakistan – Jacobabad, Quetta and Pasni – have become US
airbases. During the Afghan war, the US acquired three
airbases in that country, at Bagram, Mazar-e-Sharif and
Kandahar.
Jha takes pains to explain the intricacies
of the US’s military expansionism, and contends that the
NATO air strikes on Serbia were in fact a rehearsal of
empire-building. According to the author, the 350-year-old
Westphalian international order came to an end on 19 March
2003, when the US and UK invaded Iraq.
Despite the desire of Washington, DC to
exert its global hegemony, the US empire is facing a gradual
erosion of power. Instead of creating an alternative space
for stability, peace and mutual dependence, Jha notes, this
erosion is generating anarchy and chaos. In the face of the
world’s darkened future, the author pins his hopes on two
particular documents – In Larger Freedom, produced in
2005 by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, and the
International Labor Organization's 2004 A Fair
Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All.
At this point, however, The Twilight of
the Nation State suddenly fails to live up to its full
promise. Although these two documents are denoucements of
the US’s neo-conservative policies, they are not potent
enough in their imagination to make even a symbolic dent in
the empire’s armor. The soft, liberal political-correctness
that governs the narratives of In Larger Freedom and
A Fair Globalization softens their critique, offering
the usual homilies about development, security, human rights
and the rule of law. The lack of vigor, passion and
political sharpness – which could hypothetically create an
international movement that could dissolve the empire –
makes these dissents tame. Ending on such a flat note also
gives an unfortunately anticlimactic end to an otherwise a
path-breaking book. |